Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ice-dualstack-fairness-03

Request Review of draft-ietf-ice-dualstack-fairness
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2016-07-08
Requested 2016-06-30
Authors Paal-Erik Martinsen , Tirumaleswar Reddy.K , Prashanth Patil
I-D last updated 2016-07-19
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -03 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -03 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -07 by Meral Shirazipour
Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Charlie Kaufman (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -02 by Tim Chown (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Meral Shirazipour
State Completed
Review review-ietf-ice-dualstack-fairness-03-genart-lc-shirazipour-2016-07-19
Reviewed revision 03 (document currently at 07)
Result Ready with Nits
Completed 2016-07-19

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team
(Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF
Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

Document:  draft-ietf-ice-dualstack-fairness-03

Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour

Review Date: 2016-07-05

IETF LC End Date:  2016-07-08

IESG Telechat date: NA


This draft is ready to be published as BCP RFC but I have some comments.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:

-[Page 2], "arguable be better"---->"arguably be better"

-[Page 2], "types know"---->"types known"

-[Page 8], Section 7.1 and 7.2 have the same title, is that by choice?

-[Page 9], Section 10.1, first reference ([I-D.ietf-ice-rfc5245bis])to be
updated to latest version.

-Also on [Page 4] Reference to "section" of [I-D.ietf-ice-rfc5245bis],
it would be good to list the section title too (in case the numbering changes
in the final version).

Best Regards,



Meral Shirazipour

Ericsson Research