Telechat Review of draft-ietf-ice-dualstack-fairness-07
review-ietf-ice-dualstack-fairness-07-genart-telechat-shirazipour-2016-12-01-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-ice-dualstack-fairness |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 07) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2016-08-30 | |
Requested | 2016-09-01 | |
Authors | Paal-Erik Martinsen , Tirumaleswar Reddy.K , Prashanth Patil | |
I-D last updated | 2016-12-01 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -03
by Meral Shirazipour
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -03 by Meral Shirazipour (diff) Genart Telechat review of -07 by Meral Shirazipour Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Charlie Kaufman (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -02 by Tim Chown (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Meral Shirazipour |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-ice-dualstack-fairness by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 07 | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2016-12-01 |
review-ietf-ice-dualstack-fairness-07-genart-telechat-shirazipour-2016-12-01-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-ice-dualstack-fairness-07 Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour Review Date: 2016-11-26 IETF LC End Date: 2016-11-27 (1st:2016-07-08) IESG Telechat date: NA Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Best Current Practice RFC. Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: [Page 1], "BSD License text as described in Section 4.e " mistakenly the html version (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ice-dualstack-fairness-07 )points to Section 4 of the draft (whereas it refers to BSD licensing document) [Page 3], "Dependant on the nomination"--->"Dependent on the nomination" Section 3 and 4 title: "Recomendations"--->"Recommendations" [Page 5], Section 4, formula would be clearer if the division round up rule was specifically mentioned. [Page 7], "Dependant of the nomination"--->"Dependent on the nomination" Best Regards, Meral --- Meral Shirazipour Ericsson Research www.ericsson.com