Last Call Review of draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-03
review-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-03-genart-lc-davies-2013-02-27-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2013-02-22 | |
| Requested | 2013-02-14 | |
| Authors | Jon Mitchell | |
| Draft last updated | 2013-02-27 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -03
by
Elwyn B. Davies
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -04 by Elwyn B. Davies (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Sam Hartman (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Elwyn B. Davies |
| State | Completed | |
| Review |
review-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-03-genart-lc-davies-2013-02-27
|
|
| Reviewed revision | 03 (document currently at 05) | |
| Result | Ready with Nits | |
| Completed | 2013-02-27 |
review-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-03-genart-lc-davies-2013-02-27-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-03.txt Reviewer: Elwyn Davies Review Date: 15 February 2013 IETF LC End Date: 22 February 2013 IESG Telechat date: (if known) - Summary: Ready for the IESG. Nits/editorial comments: The draft is not actually definitive about range of values to be allocated - the range in s10 is just a 'suggestion'. Who is actually making the decision about the range? Aside: I noted that the highest possible 32 bit number (4294967295 = 0xFFFFFFFF) is excluded from the proposed range. This is marked as reserved in the IANA table but AFAICS this reserved item does not have a specification associated with the reservation. This document would be an opportunity to explicitly mention that the topmost value is reserved (for future expansion? :-) )