Last Call Review of draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-03
review-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-03-secdir-lc-hartman-2013-02-21-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2013-02-22 | |
| Requested | 2013-02-14 | |
| Authors | Jon Mitchell | |
| I-D last updated | 2013-02-21 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -03
by Elwyn B. Davies
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -04 by Elwyn B. Davies (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Sam Hartman (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Sam Hartman |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 03 (document currently at 05) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2013-02-21 |
review-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-03-secdir-lc-hartman-2013-02-21-00
I reviewed this draft. It reserves a new range of private-use ASNs from the 4-octet range and updates the existing reservation from the 16-bit range. It's effectively just an IANA action. I believe the security implications of private-use ASNs are adequately documented elsewhere and really fall into the category of "mostly harmless". I see no issues.