Telechat Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-04
review-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-04-intdir-telechat-chown-2021-12-01-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | Internet Area Directorate (intdir) | |
Deadline | 2021-12-01 | |
Requested | 2021-12-01 | |
Requested by | Éric Vyncke | |
Authors | Christoph Loibl | |
I-D last updated | 2021-12-01 | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Last Call review of -03
by Stig Venaas
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Daniel Migault (diff) Intdir Telechat review of -04 by Tim Chown (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Tim Chown |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry by Internet Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/ul35Eqhi4-EHu8QBomkPlA90S5U | |
Reviewed revision | 04 (document currently at 05) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2021-12-01 |
review-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-04-intdir-telechat-chown-2021-12-01-00
Hi, I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-04. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>. The draft updates various registries to change the “Experimental use” registration procedure for certain entries given their current practical use. The document is well-written, concise and easy to follow. Based on my review, the document is Ready for publication, with just one suggestion / nit to consider. Nit: The edits proposed to https://www.iana.org/assignments/bgp-extended-communities/bgp-extended-communities.xhtml appear correct. I would suggest adding this explicit link to the draft, for clarity, rather than just saying “to the registry” assuming readers will find it easily. Tim