Telechat Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid-14
review-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid-14-secdir-telechat-nystrom-2021-05-17-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 15) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2021-05-18 | |
| Requested | 2021-05-05 | |
| Authors | Jim Uttaro , Juan Alcaide , Clarence Filsfils , David Smith , Prodosh Mohapatra | |
| I-D last updated | 2021-05-17 | |
| Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Early review of -11
by Geoff Huston
(diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -13 by Ron Bonica (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -13 by Magnus Nyström (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -14 by Magnus Nyström (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Magnus Nyström |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/Lw66NAmGMVG5EWq8QAFx2R9iJk8 | |
| Reviewed revision | 14 (document currently at 15) | |
| Result | Has nits | |
| Completed | 2021-05-17 |
review-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid-14-secdir-telechat-nystrom-2021-05-17-00
I was asked to re-review -14 after my review of -13. I'd like to thank the authors for making updates based on my review of -13. The only additional suggestion I have is to ad a clarifying statement after the sentence "If the condition of the peer is unknown, the rule SHOULD not be enforced" along the lines of "As mentioned above, this does represent a security risk."