Last Call Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-18
review-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-18-secdir-lc-melnikov-2021-12-16-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 24) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2021-12-17 | |
Requested | 2021-12-03 | |
Authors | Alexander Azimov , Eugene Bogomazov , Randy Bush , Keyur Patel , Kotikalapudi Sriram | |
I-D last updated | 2021-12-16 | |
Completed reviews |
Secdir Early review of -15
by Alexey Melnikov
(diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -15 by Mach Chen (diff) Rtgdir Last Call review of -18 by Ines Robles (diff) Genart Last Call review of -18 by Gyan Mishra (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -18 by Alexey Melnikov (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Alexey Melnikov |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/tRksgOvYwAU6S4tT2CZYDr7BdQQ | |
Reviewed revision | 18 (document currently at 24) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2021-12-16 |
review-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-18-secdir-lc-melnikov-2021-12-16-00
Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review result: Ready I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. I reviewed an earlier version of this document and found its Security Considerations to be adequate. Reading the new version I see that they are much improved and discuss various unintentional and malicious modifications in more details. I think the document is better for the new Security Considerations.