Early Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-sr-vtn-mt-08
review-ietf-idr-bgpls-sr-vtn-mt-08-opsdir-early-nainar-2025-04-16-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-sr-vtn-mt |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 14) | |
| Type | Early Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2025-04-04 | |
| Requested | 2025-03-15 | |
| Requested by | Susan Hares | |
| Authors | Chongfeng Xie , Cong Li , Jie Dong , Zhenbin Li | |
| I-D last updated | 2025-10-21 (Latest revision 2025-10-16) | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Early review of -07
by Corey Bonnell
(diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -07 by Loa Andersson (diff) Opsdir Early review of -08 by Nagendra Kumar Nainar (diff) Genart IETF Last Call review of -12 by Christer Holmberg (diff) Secdir IETF Last Call review of -12 by Corey Bonnell (diff) |
|
| Comments |
This is an informational draft. |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Nagendra Kumar Nainar |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Early review on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-sr-vtn-mt by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/O4aJ8VKPK3iCWGtagu_QeOViw7I | |
| Reviewed revision | 08 (document currently at 14) | |
| Result | Has nits | |
| Completed | 2025-04-16 |
review-ietf-idr-bgpls-sr-vtn-mt-08-opsdir-early-nainar-2025-04-16-00
Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts per guidelines in RFC5706. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Overall Summary: This draft is an information track document proposing the mechanism of leveraging the BGL-LS MT extensions to carry the NRP attributes .Overall this is a straight forward and a well written document that appears to addresses all potential operational aspects. I am marking it as "have nits" only to address the below that appears to be a typo error. More details below: "At the AS-level topology, different inter-domain NRPs may have different inter-AS connectivity. In this case, different BGP Peer Set SIDs need to be allocated to represent the groups of BGP peers which can be used for load-balancing in each inter-domain NRP. The association between the BGP Peer Node SIDs and the MT-ID of the NRP needs to be advertised by the ASBR." ==> I think the above should be "Peer Set SIDs" instead of "Peer Node SIDs" Thanks, Nagendra