Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-19
review-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-19-secdir-lc-takahashi-2020-11-02-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 22)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2020-10-21
Requested 2020-10-07
Authors Christoph Loibl , Robert Raszuk , Susan Hares
Draft last updated 2020-11-02
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -17 by Jonathan Hardwick (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -19 by Takeshi Takahashi (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -17 by Dale R. Worley (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -16 by Wesley Eddy (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -17 by Qin Wu (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -17 by Vincent Roca (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -17 by Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Takeshi Takahashi
State Completed
Review review-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-19-secdir-lc-takahashi-2020-11-02
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/5z-irzPiIv99YuWkQGHTdLqT3js
Reviewed revision 19 (document currently at 22)
Result Ready
Completed 2020-11-02
review-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-19-secdir-lc-takahashi-2020-11-02-00
This draft extends internet-draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis to cope with IPv6.
As mentioned in the Security Consideration section, no new security issues are
added to the GBP protocol.

Note that, as mentioned in the security consideration section of the 5575bis
draft, any relaxation of the validation procedure may allow unwanted Flow
Specifications to be propagated, but this draft does not incur any such
relaxation because the validation procedure remains the same.

Very minor editorial comment:

[Section 3.2]
the same as in Section 3.1 -> the same as in Section 3.1.