Last Call Review of draft-ietf-idr-large-community-11
review-ietf-idr-large-community-11-secdir-lc-roca-2016-12-22-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-idr-large-community
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 12)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2016-12-16
Requested 2016-12-02
Other Reviews Rtgdir Early review of -06 by Geoff Huston (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -06 by Danny McPherson (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -11 by Rick Casarez (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -11 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Review State Completed
Reviewer Vincent Roca
Review review-ietf-idr-large-community-11-secdir-lc-roca-2016-12-22
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/qUtK0yIChCDa_Vc_ePJlDGonecM
Reviewed rev. 11 (document currently at 12)
Review result Ready
Last updated 2016-12-22

Review
review-ietf-idr-large-community-11-secdir-lc-roca-2016-12-22

Hello,

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate’s ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

IMHO, the document is Ready.

This document specifies an extension to BGP Communities.
The initial RFC1997 being a bit old, it does not include any security discussion section.
Therefore it is important that the present document has a detailed discussion on the
topic, which is actually the case. The level of details seems appropriate.
Furthermore there is a dedicated "Error handling" section which is also fine.

Cheers,

   Vincent