IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-idr-rfc4360-bis-08
review-ietf-idr-rfc4360-bis-08-opsdir-lc-liu-2026-06-26-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-idr-rfc4360-bis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2026-06-26
Requested 2026-06-17
Requested by Mohamed Boucadair
Authors Srihari R. Sangli , Nat Kao
I-D last updated 2026-07-16 (Latest revision 2026-07-13)
Completed reviews Rtgdir Early review of -02 by Zhaohui (Jeffrey) Zhang (diff)
Bgpdir Early review of -07 by Serge Krier (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -08 by Will (Shucheng) LIU (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Will (Shucheng) LIU
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-idr-rfc4360-bis by Ops Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/xUnPaZU5YxWLk_8ZoC6KfEslhJM
Reviewed revision 08 (document currently at 09)
Result Ready
Completed 2026-06-26
review-ietf-idr-rfc4360-bis-08-opsdir-lc-liu-2026-06-26-00
Hi,

I have been selected as the Operational Directorate (opsdir) reviewer for this
Internet-Draft. I had a look at the latest version of
draft-ietf-idr-rfc4360-bis and believe this document can be considered Ready.

From an OPSDIR point of view, it is good to have Section 6 on Operations, but
it should be replaced and renamed as "Operational Considerations" section, as
suggested in draft-ietf-opsawg-rfc5706bis.

I would also clarify in the Operational Considerations section that there are
no backward compatibility issues with RFC4360, considering that the encodings
of the extended communities are unchanged in this document.