Last Call Review of draft-ietf-idr-route-oscillation-stop-02
review-ietf-idr-route-oscillation-stop-02-secdir-lc-lonvick-2016-04-28-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-idr-route-oscillation-stop |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 04) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2016-04-29 | |
| Requested | 2016-04-21 | |
| Authors | Daniel Walton , Alvaro Retana , Enke Chen , John Scudder | |
| Draft last updated | 2016-04-28 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -02
by
Paul Kyzivat
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -02 by Paul Kyzivat (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -02 by Chris M. Lonvick (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -02 by Jon Mitchell (diff) Rtgdir Early review of -00 by Tony Przygienda (diff) Rtgdir Early review of -02 by He Jia (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Chris M. Lonvick |
| State | Completed | |
| Review |
review-ietf-idr-route-oscillation-stop-02-secdir-lc-lonvick-2016-04-28
|
|
| Reviewed revision | 02 (document currently at 04) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2016-04-28 |
review-ietf-idr-route-oscillation-stop-02-secdir-lc-lonvick-2016-04-28-00
Hi,
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.
Overall this document appears to be ready. The Security
Considerations Section points back to the overall security concerns
of BGP [RFC4271] as this specification does not add any new
parameters. I think this is appropriate.
Regards,
Chris