Early Review of draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-nrp-03
review-ietf-idr-sr-policy-nrp-03-rtgdir-early-rogge-2025-07-28-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-nrp
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Early Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2025-07-28
Requested 2025-07-12
Requested by Susan Hares
Authors Jie Dong , Zhibo Hu, Ran Pang
I-D last updated 2026-02-11 (Latest revision 2026-02-11)
Completed reviews Opsdir Early review of -03 by Menachem Dodge (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -03 by Henning Rogge (diff)
Secdir Early review of -06 by Dave Thaler (diff)
Comments 
Has passed WG LC, RTG-DIR + OPS-DIr + SEC-DIR needed for forwarding to AD.
Assignment Reviewer Henning Rogge
State Completed
Request Early review on draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-nrp by Routing Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/ZVYPwtqSJIY-r6i5nkZ0-rI4ZDU
Reviewed revision 03 (document currently at 07)
Result Has nits
Completed 2025-07-28
review-ietf-idr-sr-policy-nrp-03-rtgdir-early-rogge-2025-07-28-00
Hello,

my only question when reading draft-ietf-mpls-mna-fwk-15 and
draft-ietf-teas-nrp-scalability-07 I noticed that both do not guarantee that
the NRP Selector ID is 32 bit or longer. I am not a BGP expert so I wonder if
this document should mention how to deal with shorter Selector IDs than the 32
bit NRP ID to do the encapsulation it proposes in chapter 3.

Other than this question I think the document is Ready for publication.

Henning Rogge