Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-19

Request Review of draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 22)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2020-10-01
Requested 2020-09-17
Authors Keyur Patel , Gunter Van de Velde , Srihari R. Sangli , John Scudder
Draft last updated 2020-10-04
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -19 by Harish Sitaraman (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -19 by Gyan Mishra (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -19 by Brian Trammell (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -19 by Jouni Korhonen (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -20 by Scott G. Kelly (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Jouni Korhonen
State Completed
Review review-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-19-opsdir-lc-korhonen-2020-10-04
Posted at
Reviewed revision 19 (document currently at 22)
Result Has Nits
Completed 2020-10-04
I find this document ready for publication. Some editorial nits and generic
comments below:

* Lines 522-525: Using parenthesis around references is a bit odd looking.
However, the RFC editor can decide what to do with this kind of style. The same
style is used also in other places of the document, while the usual without
parenthesis is also used. * There are several cases where an acronym is used
before expanding it or never expanding it (such as AS). However, the RFC editor
will likely take care of these. * Line 1060 opens a parenthesis and text in it
but never closes it. * Line 1533 s/section/Section * Section 13 IANA
  - There is a separate sub-Section for RFC556 and RFC5640. However, there is
  no sub-Section for RFC5512, which is handles in the abstract of Section 13.
  Consider adding an equivalent sub-Section for RFC5512 as well.

* I believe the three downrefs reported by IDnits are required for this