Last Call Review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-07
review-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-07-opsdir-lc-banks-2016-01-11-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 10) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
Deadline | 2016-01-05 | |
Requested | 2015-12-22 | |
Authors | Jayantheesh , Narendra Singh Bisht | |
I-D last updated | 2016-01-11 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -07
by Peter E. Yee
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Paul Wouters (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Sarah Banks (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Sarah Banks |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 07 (document currently at 10) | |
Result | Has nits | |
Completed | 2016-01-11 |
review-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-07-opsdir-lc-banks-2016-01-11-00
I have reviewed draft-ietf-imapapnd-appendlimit-extension-08 as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The document is ready with a minor nit/comment. This draft discusses an extension to IMAP, where a server can use APPENDLIMIT to communicate to the client the maximum mail upload size, via several commands (status, list, capability). The document cites a particularly useful use case, of mobile devices and resource contention. I found the document fairly well written, and I have a single comment: Section 3.1 - is the should in "should issue a STATUS command" normative? It reads as if it could be... Authors, thanks for making me research "hone in" versus "home in" (ala section 6). :) Kind regards, Sarah