Last Call Review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis-04
review-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis-04-secdir-lc-wierenga-2016-03-17-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 04) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2016-03-21 | |
| Requested | 2016-03-10 | |
| Authors | Alexey Melnikov | |
| I-D last updated | 2018-12-20 (Latest revision 2016-03-06) | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart IETF Last Call review of -04
by Joel M. Halpern
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -04 by Mahesh Jethanandani Secdir IETF Last Call review of -04 by Klaas Wierenga |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Klaas Wierenga |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 04 | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2016-03-17 |
review-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis-04-secdir-lc-wierenga-2016-03-17-00
Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The document describes 2 IMAP extensions, LITERAL+ and LITERAL- that allow for non synchronizing literals. I believe this document is ready for publication Klaas Sent from my iPad