Last Call Review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis-04
review-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis-04-secdir-lc-wierenga-2016-03-17-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 04) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2016-03-21 | |
| Requested | 2016-03-10 | |
| Authors | Alexey Melnikov | |
| I-D last updated | 2016-03-17 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -04
by Joel M. Halpern
Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Mahesh Jethanandani Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Klaas Wierenga |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Klaas Wierenga |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 04 | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2016-03-17 |
review-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis-04-secdir-lc-wierenga-2016-03-17-00
Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The document describes 2 IMAP extensions, LITERAL+ and LITERAL- that allow for non synchronizing literals. I believe this document is ready for publication Klaas Sent from my iPad