Skip to main content

IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-intarea-v4-via-v6-07
review-ietf-intarea-v4-via-v6-07-secdir-lc-odonoghue-2026-04-14-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-intarea-v4-via-v6
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2026-04-14
Requested 2026-03-16
Authors Juliusz Chroboczek , Warren Kumari , Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
I-D last updated 2026-04-24 (Latest revision 2026-04-17)
Completed reviews Genart IETF Last Call review of -07 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -07 by Barry Leiba (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -07 by Thomas Graf (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -07 by Karen O'Donoghue (diff)
Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -07 by David L. Black (diff)
Rtgdir IETF Last Call review of -08 by Emmanuel Baccelli
Assignment Reviewer Karen O'Donoghue
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-intarea-v4-via-v6 by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/iND07oiYQ_gIxSfnGBnnBrjQ3gE
Reviewed revision 07 (document currently at 08)
Result Ready
Completed 2026-04-14
review-ietf-intarea-v4-via-v6-07-secdir-lc-odonoghue-2026-04-14-00
Document: draft-ietf-intarea-v4-via-v6
Title: IPv4 routes with an IPv6 next hop
Reviewer: Karen O'Donoghue
Review result: Ready

# Overall

This is a short clearly written document. It provides a mechanism to route
IPv4 packets through an IPv6 next hop. It seems very straightforward given 
the limited scope of the document. 

# Security considerations

The security considerations section of this document is pretty short,
basically indicating that this document provides some additional 
flexibility and with that flexibility comes some security risks based 
on assumptions that network administrators could reasonably make. It doesn't 
do very much to address those risks, but it does identify the possibility of
those risks. The tools and processes used to manage networks using this 
mechanism would need to be appropriately updated to manage those risks.