IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-iotops-7228bis-07
review-ietf-iotops-7228bis-07-iotdir-lc-korhonen-2026-05-06-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-iotops-7228bis |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 08) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Internet of Things Directorate (iotdir) | |
| Deadline | 2026-05-06 | |
| Requested | 2026-04-22 | |
| Requested by | Mohamed Boucadair | |
| Authors | Carsten Bormann , Mehmet Ersue , Ari Keränen , Carles Gomez | |
| I-D last updated | 2026-06-04 (Latest revision 2026-05-15) | |
| Completed reviews |
Artart IETF Last Call review of -06
by Valery Smyslov
(diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -07 by Shawn M Emery (diff) Iotdir IETF Last Call review of -07 by Jouni Korhonen (diff) Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -07 by Marcus Ihlar (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Jouni Korhonen |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-iotops-7228bis by Internet of Things Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iot-directorate/wHzpWGkC5kYsSHLFEnSPxFN8XaQ | |
| Reviewed revision | 07 (document currently at 08) | |
| Result | Ready w/nits | |
| Completed | 2026-05-06 |
review-ietf-iotops-7228bis-07-iotdir-lc-korhonen-2026-05-06-00
Having read the document I think it is about ready. There are few editorial nits listed that could be fixed, however, they are just for better clarity. 1) Line 425: What is 'Ps' or rather why it is used here? - I see there is acronym description in Section 4.1. but its placement still feels odd here. 2) Line 436: 'Ps' again. A bit confusing since Ps in parenthesis do not refer to an expanded acronym. - "..of sustained power usage (Ps)." 3) Line 710: I would provide some literature reference to "Event-based harvesting".. 4) Line 824: what is an RC oscillator? Reference or expand RC etc.