Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring-06
review-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring-06-genart-lc-campbell-2013-10-23-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 08) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2013-10-23 | |
| Requested | 2013-10-10 | |
| Authors | Shingo Kashima , Atsushi Kobayashi , Paul Aitken | |
| I-D last updated | 2013-10-23 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -06
by Ben Campbell
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -07 by Ben Campbell (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Sam Hartman (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Ben Campbell |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 06 (document currently at 08) | |
| Result | Ready w/issues | |
| Completed | 2013-10-23 |
review-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring-06-genart-lc-campbell-2013-10-23-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring-06 Reviewer: Ben Campbell Review Date: 2013-22-10 IETF LC End Date: 2013-23-10 Summary: Ready for publication as a proposed standard, with one problem that should be easily fixed. Major issues: None Minor issues: 3.2.18: Title of the data element suggests a total, but the description sounds like a delta (i.e change since last report.) -- section 4 and subsections It looks like this draft updates at least RFC5477. If so, this should be indicated in the header and in the abstract. Nits/editorial comments: -- section , 3rd paragraph: Do you mean to say the existing data models do not contain the elements needed, or that the models do not provide the right foundation for the needed elements? The wording seems to indicate the latter but I think you mean the former. -- General: Watch for missing articles.