Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive-04
review-ietf-ippm-active-passive-04-opsdir-lc-korhonen-2015-12-14-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 06)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2015-12-24
Requested 2015-12-12
Authors Al Morton
I-D last updated 2015-12-14
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -04 by Brian E. Carpenter (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -05 by Brian E. Carpenter (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Carl Wallace (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Jouni Korhonen (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Jouni Korhonen
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive by Ops Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 04 (document currently at 06)
Result Has nits
Completed 2015-12-14
review-ietf-ippm-active-passive-04-opsdir-lc-korhonen-2015-12-14-00
Hi,



I have reviewed draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive-04 as part of the 


Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents 


being processed by the IESG.  These comments were written with the 


intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments 


that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during 


the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these 


comments just like any other last call comments.




Summary: Ready with issues

Major:	None.

Minor:



* The IDnits gives a comment but the outdated reference can be corrected 


at any time seen appropriate.




* Line 412:  expand DSCP on the first use.

* Lines 413-414: there is no closing ")".



* Lines 491-494: I find a discussion about IPR converage in this I-D 


somewhat odd. Specifically because there are no hard facts i.e., "..may 


be covered.." Maybe it is just me and if the WG has agree to have such 


text there I have no problem with it.





- Jouni