Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-10
review-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-10-rtgdir-lc-white-2017-09-28-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 13)
Type Last Call Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2017-09-27
Requested 2017-09-13
Requested by Spencer Dawkins
Other Reviews Secdir Last Call review of -13 by Tom Yu
Genart Last Call review of -10 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Intdir Last Call review of -10 by Brian Haberman (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -12 by Eric Vyncke (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -12 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -13 by Linda Dunbar
Comments
These are the reviews requested by the document shepherd.
Review State Completed
Reviewer Russ White
Review review-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-10-rtgdir-lc-white-2017-09-28
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/g6if4LmN6DyS9MmmrevKZFhzPds
Reviewed rev. 10 (document currently at 13)
Review result Ready
Draft last updated 2017-09-28
Review closed: 2017-09-28

Review
review-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-10-rtgdir-lc-white-2017-09-28

Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see ​http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-ippm-alt-mark-10 
Reviewer: Russ White 
Review Date: 9/28/2017
IETF LC End Date: 9/29/2017
Intended Status: Experimental

No issues found. This document is ready for publication.

The draft is readable and clear about the process, potential problems, and the experimental results of trying the mechanism described. 

No major issues, no minor issues, no nits.

/r