IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts-10
review-ietf-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts-10-genart-lc-holmberg-2026-02-11-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2026-02-18 | |
| Requested | 2026-02-04 | |
| Authors | Greg Mirsky , Ernesto Ruffini , Henrik Nydell , Richard "Footer" Foote , Will Hawkins | |
| I-D last updated | 2026-03-05 (Latest revision 2026-02-20) | |
| Completed reviews |
Tsvart Early review of -07
by Lars Eggert
(diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -11 by Stephen Farrell Genart IETF Last Call review of -10 by Christer Holmberg (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Christer Holmberg |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/mh57iGi6LVlFLkBujZctYJ44FqE | |
| Reviewed revision | 10 (document currently at 11) | |
| Result | Ready w/nits | |
| Completed | 2026-02-11 |
review-ietf-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts-10-genart-lc-holmberg-2026-02-11-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. Document: draft-ietf-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts-10 Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review Date: 2026-02-11 IETF LC End Date: 2026-02-18 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: The document is well written, and easy to understand. I only have a couple of editorial comments that I would like the authors to address. Major issues: N/A Minor issues: N/A Nits/editorial comments: Q1: The Abstract is far too long. I think it would be enough with something like: "This document specifies an optional extension to the Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol (STAMP) to control the length and/or number of packets sent by a Session-Reflector in response to a single test packet from the Session-Sender during a STAMP test session. This supports cases where a Session-Reflector responding with Asymmetrical Packets would ensure a closer approximation between active performance measurements and the conditions experienced by monitored application." Q2: In the Introduction, I suggest to put the current 1st chapter to the end. First describe what the draft does, and then how it does it.