IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-integrity-yang-06
review-ietf-ippm-ioam-integrity-yang-06-intdir-lc-matsushima-2026-04-21-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-integrity-yang |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 08) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Internet Area Directorate (intdir) | |
| Deadline | 2026-04-23 | |
| Requested | 2026-04-14 | |
| Requested by | Éric Vyncke | |
| Authors | Justin Iurman , Tianran Zhou | |
| I-D last updated | 2026-08-07 (Latest revision 2026-05-08) | |
| Completed reviews |
Yangdoctors Early review of -04
by Qiufang Ma
(diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -05 by Roni Even (diff) Yangdoctors IETF Last Call review of -06 by Qiufang Ma (diff) Intdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by Satoru Matsushima (diff) Secdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by Corey Bonnell (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Satoru Matsushima |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-integrity-yang by Internet Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/bX7yLxB5GBlGdw6nMi0KVnOK6eo | |
| Reviewed revision | 06 (document currently at 08) | |
| Result | Ready w/nits | |
| Completed | 2026-04-21 |
review-ietf-ippm-ioam-integrity-yang-06-intdir-lc-matsushima-2026-04-21-00
I reviewed draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-integrity-yang-06. Overall, I think the document is ready with some nits. The model is straightforward: it augments the RFC 9617 IOAM YANG model with integrity-protected profiles and defines the companion IANA-maintained YANG module for integrity protection method identifiers. I do not have any major technical concerns. Nits 1: It would help readers if the document explicitly stated why there is no integrity-protected Direct Export profile. RFC 9617 covers five IOAM options, while this document models four integrity-protected profiles. The companion integrity specification makes DEX out of scope because DEX does not carry IOAM-Data-Fields. A short explanatory sentence in the Introduction or Section 3.1 would avoid confusion. 2: Section 6.1 and Appendix A still contain unresolved template placeholders which need to be completed with the actual registry name and the final IANA reference.