Telechat Review of draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-05
review-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-05-genart-telechat-davies-2014-09-12-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2014-09-02
Requested 2014-08-28
Draft last updated 2014-09-12
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -05 by Elwyn Davies (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -05 by Elwyn Davies (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by David Harrington (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -05 by David Harrington (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Elwyn Davies
State Completed
Review review-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-05-genart-telechat-davies-2014-09-12
Reviewed rev. 05 (document currently at 07)
Review result Ready with Nits
Review completed: 2014-09-12

Review
review-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-05-genart-telechat-davies-2014-09-12

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-05.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 29 August 2014
IETF LC End Date: 22 August 2014
IESG Telechat date: 4 September 2014

Summary:


Al Morton has shown me a set of changes that seem to address the points 


I made in my Last Call review.  Assuming they make it into -06 that'll 


be fine by me.






For the record, I didn't have the same problem as Barry and Adrian did 


with the term 'reference path'. My view was that it looked like a 


'reference point' and I know what one of those is.  But a little more 


explanation would doubtless help.




Regards,
Elwyn