Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ippm-owamp-registry-02
review-ietf-ippm-owamp-registry-02-genart-lc-even-2015-09-10-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ippm-owamp-registry
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 03)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2015-09-10
Requested 2015-08-27
Authors Al Morton
I-D last updated 2015-09-10
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -02 by Roni Even (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -02 by Alan DeKok (diff)
Opsdir Early review of -02 by Nevil Brownlee (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Roni Even
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-ippm-owamp-registry by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 02 (document currently at 03)
Result Almost ready
Completed 2015-09-10
review-ietf-ippm-owamp-registry-02-genart-lc-even-2015-09-10-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may
receive.

Document:

draft-ietf-ippm-owamp-registry-02

Reviewer: Roni Even

Review Date:2015–9-9

IETF LC End Date: 2015–9-10

IESG Telechat date:



Summary: This draft is almost for publication as an Standard Track  RFC

.





Major issues:





Minor issues:



The document registers IKEv2-derived Shared Secret Key in section 3.2.4. Why
here and not in draft-ietf-ippm-ipsec-11.  I suggest deleting the registration
of IKEv2-derived Shared Secret Key from here. Otherwise
draft-ietf-ippm-ipsec-11 should be normative reference since the [RFC TBD]
depends on it and it may cause a delay in publication and creation of the
registry.



Nits/editorial comments:

In sections 3.1.2 and 3.2.2 the policy should be “IETF review” and not “IETF
consensus”  according to section 4.1 in RFC5226