Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-qr-alt-07
review-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-qr-alt-07-secdir-lc-wallace-2025-04-01-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-qr-alt |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 08) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2025-04-02 | |
| Requested | 2025-03-19 | |
| Authors | Valery Smyslov | |
| I-D last updated | 2025-04-02 (Latest revision 2025-04-02) | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -07
by Carl Wallace
(diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -07 by Meral Shirazipour (diff) Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -07 by Luis M. Contreras (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Carl Wallace |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-qr-alt by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/GTmBl3kVm0qjSTmhoBJVRz56qWo | |
| Reviewed revision | 07 (document currently at 08) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2025-04-01 |
review-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-qr-alt-07-secdir-lc-wallace-2025-04-01-00
The draft is a well-written and is ready as-is. Two minor nits. In the intro, change "by means of Post-Quantum Preshared Key" to "by means of a Post-Quantum Preshared Key." For table 1, I think it'd be helpful to define what '*' means. I see in some referenced drafts this same presentation is used with no definition for *, so maybe in this idiom it's fine.