Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-15
review-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-15-secdir-lc-hallam-baker-2017-01-19-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 18)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2016-12-30
Requested 2016-12-16
Authors Yoav Nir , Tero Kivinen , Paul Wouters , Daniel Migault
I-D last updated 2017-01-19
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -15 by Pete Resnick (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -15 by Phillip Hallam-Baker (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -15 by Susan Hares (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -17 by Pete Resnick (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Phillip Hallam-Baker
State Completed Snapshot
Review review-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-15-secdir-lc-hallam-baker-2017-01-19
Reviewed revision 15 (document currently at 18)
Result Has Nits
Completed 2017-01-19
review-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-15-secdir-lc-hallam-baker-2017-01-19-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

STATUS: Ready with one minor typo.


My personal taste would be to reduce the number of algorithms by half. But
that is not practical given the history so this is the best we can do in
the circumstances.



Typos

 Sec 3.4

   Group 22, 23 and 24 are MODP Groups with Prime Order Subgroups thater
   are not safe-primes.  The seeds for these groups have not been