Telechat Review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc7321bis-05
review-ietf-ipsecme-rfc7321bis-05-genart-telechat-shirazipour-2017-03-16-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc7321bis |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 06) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2017-03-14 | |
Requested | 2017-02-16 | |
Authors | Paul Wouters , Daniel Migault , John Preuß Mattsson , Yoav Nir , Tero Kivinen | |
I-D last updated | 2017-03-16 | |
Completed reviews |
Secdir Telechat review of -05
by Christian Huitema
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -05 by Meral Shirazipour (diff) Opsdir Telechat review of -05 by Fred Baker (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Meral Shirazipour |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc7321bis by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 05 (document currently at 06) | |
Result | Ready w/nits | |
Completed | 2017-03-16 |
review-ietf-ipsecme-rfc7321bis-05-genart-telechat-shirazipour-2017-03-16-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc7321bis-05 Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour Review Date: 2017-03-14 IETF LC End Date: 2017-03-15 IESG Telechat date: 2017-03-16 Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standards RFC, but I have some comments. Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: -[Page 4], "downgraded from MUST to MUST-". MUST- is defined later in the document. Perhaps a reference in the text should point to that section on p.5. -[Page 7], "were not been mentioned"---->"have not been mentioned" -[Page 7], "this document clarify"---->"this document clarifies" -[Page 11], "that revisions of that"---->"that revisions of this" -general, some acronyms are not spelled out...VPN, MTU.. -Tables P.5,6,8,9,10. Giving them a caption would make the document clearer. Best Regards, Meral --- Meral Shirazipour Ericsson Research www.ericsson.com