Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-12
review-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-12-secdir-lc-santesson-2018-08-19-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 17)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2018-08-24
Requested 2018-08-10
Authors Tommy Pauly , Paul Wouters
Draft last updated 2018-08-19
Completed reviews Opsdir Telechat review of -16 by Tim Chown (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -12 by Stefan Santesson (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -12 by Christer Holmberg (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -12 by Tim Chown (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Stefan Santesson
State Completed
Review review-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-12-secdir-lc-santesson-2018-08-19
Reviewed revision 12 (document currently at 17)
Result Has Nits
Completed 2018-08-19
review-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-12-secdir-lc-santesson-2018-08-19-00
In agreement with nit comments in the Gen-Art review.

1) Section 2. Background seems to be a duplication with the introduction
section and could probably be merged with this section.

2) In general I wander wether the requirement level "SHOULD" is to week in some
places. The concern (and question) here is whether this may lead to uncertainty
whether a Split-DNS configuration always will provide the expected level of
security (or fail), or wether such configuration may lead to successful
communication without the expected level of security ( in compliance with this
specification).