Telechat Review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-tcp-encaps-08
review-ietf-ipsecme-tcp-encaps-08-genart-telechat-dupont-2017-04-19-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-ipsecme-tcp-encaps |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 10) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2017-04-25 | |
Requested | 2017-03-28 | |
Authors | Tommy Pauly , Samy Touati , Ravi Mantha | |
I-D last updated | 2017-04-19 | |
Completed reviews |
Opsdir Telechat review of -00
by Mahesh Jethanandani
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -08 by Francis Dupont (diff) Tsvart Last Call review of -09 by Wesley Eddy (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -09 by Mahesh Jethanandani (diff) Genart Telechat review of -08 by Francis Dupont (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Francis Dupont |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-ipsecme-tcp-encaps by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 08 (document currently at 10) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2017-04-19 |
review-ietf-ipsecme-tcp-encaps-08-genart-telechat-dupont-2017-04-19-00
Note in fact this review was withdrawn but as I did it I am typing and sending it anyway. I warned the gen-art management and it seems the review came back to me. I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-ipsecme-tcp-encaps-08.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 20170317 IETF LC End Date: past IESG Telechat date: 20170411 Summary: Ready Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: - 3 page 6: if a TCP stream itself really supports very long mesages the encapsulation used in the document has a lower (but still large) limit (2^16 - sizeof(header) - 2). In general there are all provsions to discourage the use of TCP encapsulation when something simpler is available. I don't expect they will be strictly followed in the real world but IMHO you did the maximum for a spec document. Regards Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr