Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-isis-extended-sequence-no-tlv-05
review-ietf-isis-extended-sequence-no-tlv-05-genart-lc-holmberg-2015-04-11-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-isis-extended-sequence-no-tlv
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 06)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2015-04-08
Requested 2015-03-19
Authors Uma Chunduri , Wenhu Lu , Albert Tian , Naiming Shen
I-D last updated 2015-04-11
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -05 by Christer Holmberg (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -06 by Christer Holmberg
Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Adam W. Montville (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Nevil Brownlee (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Christer Holmberg
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-isis-extended-sequence-no-tlv by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 05 (document currently at 06)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2015-04-11
review-ietf-isis-extended-sequence-no-tlv-05-genart-lc-holmberg-2015-04-11-00

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>



Document:                         draft-ietf-isis-extended-sequence-no-tlv-05



Reviewer:                           Christer Holmberg



Review Date:                     11 April 2015



IETF LC End Date:             8 April 2015



IETF Telechat Date:         N/A



Summary:        The document is well written, and almost ready for publication.
I only have a couple of minor editorial comments (see below).



Major Issues: None



Minor Issues: None



Editorial nits:



Q1:        In the Introduction, please expand “IS-IS” on first occurrence
(outside the Abstract)



Q2:        In the Introduction, could you add some reference to “IS-IS” on the
first occurrence?