Last Call Review of draft-ietf-isis-pcr-03
review-ietf-isis-pcr-03-opsdir-lc-dunbar-2015-12-22-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-isis-pcr |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
Deadline | 2016-01-05 | |
Requested | 2015-12-12 | |
Authors | János Farkas , Nigel Bragg , Paul Unbehagen , Glenn Parsons , Peter J. Ashwood-Smith , Chris Bowers | |
I-D last updated | 2015-12-22 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -04
by Suresh Krishnan
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Rich Salz (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -03 by Linda Dunbar (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Linda Dunbar |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-isis-pcr by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 03 (document currently at 05) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2015-12-22 |
review-ietf-isis-pcr-03-opsdir-lc-dunbar-2015-12-22-00
Folks, I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Summary: Ready for publication Major issues: None Minor issues: Why the Bandwidth Constraint sub-TLV is not same as the Bandwidth Sub-TLV defined by https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-isis-te-metric-extensions-07#page-10 ? Need to make sure that the Bandwidth Sub-TLV (unidirectional available bandwidth, unidirectional utilized bandwidth sub-TLV, etc), of draft-ietf-isis-te-metric-extensions is consistent. Cheers, Linda Dunbar