Last Call Review of draft-ietf-isis-remaining-lifetime-01

Request Review of draft-ietf-isis-remaining-lifetime
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 04)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2016-08-15
Requested 2016-08-04
Authors Les Ginsberg, Paul Wells, Bruno Decraene, Tony Przygienda, Hannes Gredler
Draft last updated 2016-08-19
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -02 by Christer Holmberg (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -01 by Rich Salz (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -01 by Tim Wicinski (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Rich Salz 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-isis-remaining-lifetime-01-secdir-lc-salz-2016-08-19
Reviewed rev. 01 (document currently at 04)
Review result Has Nits
Review completed: 2016-08-19


Re-sending because of typo in some addresses; sorry for the dups

Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
IM: richsalz at Twitter: RichSalz

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Salz, Rich
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 8:49 AM
> To: '?iesg at'; '?secdir at'; 'draft-ietf-isis-remaining-
> lifetime.all at'
> Subject: secdir review of draft-ietf-isis-remaining-lifetime
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's  ongoing
> effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
> comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
> directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments
> just like any other last call comments.
> This document is READY with one possible NIT.
> I assume that "flooding" is a standard term used in the IS-IS community. If so,
> fine; if not, consider another term like "distribution" since flooding can have
> negative connotations in the security community, related to denial of service.
> The problem statement was particularly well-done and informative.
> --
> Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
> IM: richsalz at Twitter: RichSalz