Last Call Review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00
review-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00-secdir-lc-orman-2014-01-02-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 00) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2013-12-24 | |
| Requested | 2013-12-12 | |
| Authors | Mike Shand , Les Ginsberg | |
| I-D last updated | 2014-01-02 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -00
by Dan Romascanu
Secdir Last Call review of -00 by Hilarie Orman |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Hilarie Orman |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 00 | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2014-01-02 |
review-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00-secdir-lc-orman-2014-01-02-00
Reclassification of RFC 1142 to Historic draft-ietf-isis-rfc1142-to-historic-00 Do not be alarmed. I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. RFC1142 described an early version of the ISO protocol for intradomain routing and its use with IP. The description of the ISO protocol did not match the final version, and ever since there has been some confusion about what to cite with respect to this ISO standard. The reclassification of RFC1142 to historic may help alleviate the confusion. There are no security issues for consideration in this document. Hilarie