Telechat Review of draft-ietf-isis-te-metric-extensions-09
review-ietf-isis-te-metric-extensions-09-secdir-telechat-weis-2016-02-04-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-isis-te-metric-extensions |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2016-02-02 | |
Requested | 2016-01-21 | |
Authors | Stefano Previdi , Spencer Giacalone , David Ward , John Drake , Qin Wu | |
I-D last updated | 2016-02-04 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -07
by Christer Holmberg
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -09 by Christer Holmberg (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Brian Weis (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -09 by Brian Weis (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Mahalingam Mani (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Brian Weis |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-isis-te-metric-extensions by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 09 (document currently at 11) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2016-02-04 |
review-ietf-isis-te-metric-extensions-09-secdir-telechat-weis-2016-02-04-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This is a re-review of the draft. The previous review was version -07, where I suggested adding some text to the Security Considerations noting that the sub-TLVs added in this document were especially at risk for tampering, so it would be valuable to explicitly point out the IS-IS authentication method that would mitigate the risk. The current version of the draft includes this text, and it looks good to me. I consider this draft Ready to publish. Brian