Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-jmap-calendars-18
review-ietf-jmap-calendars-18-secdir-lc-nir-2024-06-20-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-jmap-calendars
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 22)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2024-06-27
Requested 2024-06-13
Authors Neil Jenkins , Michael Douglass
I-D last updated 2024-06-20
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -18 by Roni Even (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -19 by Jean Mahoney (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -18 by Yoav Nir (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Yoav Nir
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-jmap-calendars by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/ukJbCyIaJkTbfTwsBXEfvz4wnHs
Reviewed revision 18 (document currently at 22)
Result Has nits
Completed 2024-06-20
review-ietf-jmap-calendars-18-secdir-lc-nir-2024-06-20-00
Hello,

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments
were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document
editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call
comments.

The document is clear and understandable, and the Security Considerations
section is very good.

I liked section 9.1 which highlights privacy concerns specific to calendars,
although I believe that all of these concerns also apply to email. Yes, pretty
much any event in my calendar says what I'm going to be doing at a certain
time, and very often where I'm going to be; contacts include phone numbers and
addresses, but things like that are discussed over email all the time.

Section 9.3 of calendar-specific DoS was educational for me.

NITS:
 - in section 9.3.2 s/pused/pushed/