Telechat Review of draft-ietf-json-i-json-05
review-ietf-json-i-json-05-genart-telechat-shirazipour-2015-01-19-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-json-i-json |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 06) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2015-01-20 | |
| Requested | 2015-01-15 | |
| Authors | Tim Bray | |
| I-D last updated | 2015-01-19 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -05
by Meral Shirazipour
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -05 by Meral Shirazipour (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Tero Kivinen (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -05 by Jürgen Schönwälder (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Meral Shirazipour |
| State | Completed Snapshot | |
| Review |
review-ietf-json-i-json-05-genart-telechat-shirazipour-2015-01-19
|
|
| Reviewed revision | 05 (document currently at 06) | |
| Result | Ready with Nits | |
| Completed | 2015-01-19 |
review-ietf-json-i-json-05-genart-telechat-shirazipour-2015-01-19-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-json-i-json-05 Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour Review Date: 2015-01-14 IETF LC End Date: 2015-01-14 IESG Telechat date: NA Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I have some comments . Nits/editorial comments: -Please spell out acronyms at first use. E.g. JSON, I-JSON -[Page 3], "treat an integer", it would be good to mention this is still referring to IEEE754 format. -[Page 3],"(one example would be 64-bit integers)", here not clear if still IEEE7544 is discussed or integer format. If latter, is it signed/unsigned. "RECOMMENDED to encode them in JSON string values." should this be done in decimal format then? -[Page 4], Section 3, "in the JSON messages it receives."--->"in the JSON messages they receives." -[Page 4], "receiving implementation"---->"receiving implementations" Best Regards, Meral --- Meral Shirazipour Ericsson Research www.ericsson.com