Telechat Review of draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-06
review-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-06-genart-telechat-campbell-2012-12-19-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 07) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2013-01-08 | |
| Requested | 2012-12-14 | |
| Authors | Mahesh Jethanandani , Keyur Patel , Lianshu Zheng | |
| Draft last updated | 2012-12-19 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -05
by
Ben Campbell
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -06 by Ben Campbell (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Ben Campbell |
| State | Completed | |
| Review |
review-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-06-genart-telechat-campbell-2012-12-19
|
|
| Reviewed revision | 06 (document currently at 07) | |
| Result | Ready with Nits | |
| Completed | 2012-12-19 |
review-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-06-genart-telechat-campbell-2012-12-19-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-karp-routing-tcp-analysis-07 Reviewer: Ben Campbell Review Date: 2012-12-18 IESG Telechat date: 2012-12-20 Summary: Ready for publication as an informational RFC. There are still a couple of nits that might be worth consideration prior to final publication. Note: This review is incremental to my review of version 05 at last call. All of my comments in that review have been resolved except as described in this message. ** Major issues: None ** Minor issues: None ** Nits/editorial comments: -- The 2119 paragraph was removed, but there's still an orphaned 2119 entry in the informational reference section. -- There's a new IANA considerations section. However, I suggest it contain a full sentence to the effect of "This document makes no requests of IANA" rather than simply "None". (OTOH, this may get removed before final publication anyway...)