Last Call Review of draft-ietf-kitten-aes-cts-hmac-sha2-10
review-ietf-kitten-aes-cts-hmac-sha2-10-opsdir-lc-bradner-2016-08-08-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-kitten-aes-cts-hmac-sha2 |
|---|---|---|
| Requested rev. | no specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2016-08-16 | |
| Requested | 2016-07-11 | |
| Authors | Michael Jenkins, Michael Peck, Kelley Burgin | |
| Draft last updated | 2016-08-08 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -10 by Vijay Gurbani
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -10 by Vijay Gurbani (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -10 by Watson Ladd (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -10 by Scott Bradner (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Scott Bradner |
| State | Completed Snapshot | |
| Review | review-ietf-kitten-aes-cts-hmac-sha2-10-opsdir-lc-bradner-2016-08-08 | |
| Reviewed rev. | 10 (document currently at 11) | |
| Review result | Ready | |
| Review completed: | 2016-08-08 |
Review
review-ietf-kitten-aes-cts-hmac-sha2-10-opsdir-lc-bradner-2016-08-08
This is an OPS-DIR review of draft-ietf-kitten-aes-cts-hmac-sha2-10. This ID describes additional encryption and checksum types for Kerberos 5 as well as a change in design that lowers the computing cost to verify the integrity of a received message. The updates use NIST defined standards. I did not check the crypto or security logic - I figure that any ID coming from the Security Area that has gone through 10 versions is going to be rather solid in those areas. :-) I did not find any operational concerns with the ID. Scott