Telechat Review of draft-ietf-kitten-rfc5653bis-06
review-ietf-kitten-rfc5653bis-06-genart-telechat-halpern-2018-01-02-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-kitten-rfc5653bis
Requested rev. no specific revision
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2018-01-23
Requested 2017-12-27
Other Reviews Opsdir Last Call review of -05 by Joe Clarke (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -05 by Joel Halpern (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Tim Polk (diff)
Review State Completed
Reviewer Joel Halpern
Review review-ietf-kitten-rfc5653bis-06-genart-telechat-halpern-2018-01-02
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/3Hk45g6rdxSq2CUdO0eszz-4JR0
Reviewed rev. 06
Review result Ready with Issues
Draft last updated 2018-01-02
Review completed: 2018-01-02

Review
review-ietf-kitten-rfc5653bis-06-genart-telechat-halpern-2018-01-02

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-kitten-rfc5653bis-06
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review Date: 2018-01-02
IETF LC End Date: 2017-09-11
IESG Telechat date: 2018-01-25

Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC

Major issues: None

Minor issues:
    Although ID-Nits does not complain about it, I can find no reference to RFCs 2119 or 8174.  Some of the uses of "must" int he document are along the lines of "inherently follows", which is not normative language.  But other uses are clearly normative in structure.   It is unclear why the reference to RFC 2119 was removed as part of this update.

Nits/editorial comments: