Telechat Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-07

Request Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 10)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2014-08-05
Requested 2014-07-31
Authors Raymond Key, Lucy Yong, Simon DeLord, Frederic JOUNAY, Lizhong Jin
Draft last updated 2014-08-08
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -06 by Ben Campbell (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -07 by Ben Campbell (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Ben Campbell 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-07-genart-telechat-campbell-2014-08-08
Reviewed rev. 07 (document currently at 10)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2014-08-08


I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-07
Reviewer: Ben Campbell
Review Date: 2014-08-05
IETF LC End Date: 2014-07-15
IESG Telechat date: 2014-08-07

Summary: Ready for publication as informational. All of the substantive comments from my last call review of version 06 have been addressed.

Major issues:


Minor issues:


Nits/editorial comments:

-- References: 2119 language has been removed, but there's still a reference to RFC 2119.

-- 2.2, 4th paragraph: Furthermore, MEF also defines AC roles...

This draft defines the AC roles in the terminology section. It would be helpful to mention if the MEF definitions are the same as used here, either in this section or in the respective terminology section entries.

-- 5.1, 1st sentence:

The change due to one of my previous comments renders the beginning of the sentence as " "IP/MPLS L2VPN architecture has no distinction role on Attachment
   Circuit ..." Should "distinction" be "distinctive"? If not, I'm not sure how to parse the sentence.