Last Call Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib-14
review-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib-14-opsdir-lc-banks-2014-02-06-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 15) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2014-02-14 | |
| Requested | 2014-02-01 | |
| Authors | Thomas Nadeau , Kiran Koushik , Rohit Mediratta | |
| Draft last updated | 2014-02-06 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -14
by
Meral Shirazipour
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -14 by Meral Shirazipour (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -14 by Alexey Melnikov (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -14 by Sarah Banks (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Sarah Banks |
| State | Completed Snapshot | |
| Review |
review-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib-14-opsdir-lc-banks-2014-02-06
|
|
| Reviewed revision | 14 (document currently at 15) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2014-02-06 |
review-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib-14-opsdir-lc-banks-2014-02-06-00
Hello, I've been asked to provide an OPS-DIR review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mib(-14). In general, I have no problems with the draft, and I'd like to thank the authors for taking on the awesome task of SNMP. An extremely minor nit, the formatting in section 9 (the justification of text after the RFC reference) is disparate. It'd be nice to fix that, but it's not a gate. Kind regards, Sarah