Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community-08
review-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community-08-opsdir-lc-bonica-2014-12-15-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 10)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2014-12-08
Requested 2014-11-28
Authors Jim Uttaro , Prodosh Mohapatra , David Smith , Robert Raszuk , John Scudder
Draft last updated 2014-12-15
Completed reviews Genart Telechat review of -09 by Francis Dupont (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -08 by Ron Bonica (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Ron Bonica
State Completed
Review review-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community-08-opsdir-lc-bonica-2014-12-15
Reviewed revision 08 (document currently at 10)
Result Has Issues
Completed 2014-12-15
review-ietf-l3vpn-acceptown-community-08-opsdir-lc-bonica-2014-12-15-00
Folks,

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the operational area
directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

This document is well written and well thought out. It is almost ready for
publication with one small issue.

In Section 2.3, the authors say, " ACCEPT_OWN handling SHOULD be controlled by
configuration, and SHOULD   default to being disabled. IMO, they should say,
"ACCEPT_OWN handling MUST be controlled by configuration, and MUST default to
being disabled."

AFAIKS, you would never want to build a router where ACCEPT_OWN behavior is
always on and cannot be disabled by configuration. Likewise, you would never
want to build a router where ACCEPT_OWN behavior is the default.

Ron Bonica