Telechat Review of draft-ietf-lager-specification-10
review-ietf-lager-specification-10-opsdir-telechat-dunbar-2016-04-10-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-lager-specification |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 13) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2016-04-11 | |
| Requested | 2016-03-11 | |
| Authors | Kim Davies , Asmus Freytag | |
| I-D last updated | 2020-02-23 (Latest revision 2016-05-23) | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Telechat review of -10 by Ralph Droms
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -11 by Ralph Droms (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -10 by Derek Atkins (diff) Opsdir Telechat review of -10 by Linda Dunbar (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Linda Dunbar |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-lager-specification by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 10 (document currently at 13) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2016-04-10 |
review-ietf-lager-specification-10-opsdir-telechat-dunbar-2016-04-10-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the operational area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. I find the document is written very clear, except a minor typo: Section 7.1 third line: extra “.”. Question: Can the “Match”, the “Action”, and the “Match Operators” be also used for I2RS rules? Or IDR FlowSpec rules? Linda