IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lamps-cms-ml-dsa-04
review-ietf-lamps-cms-ml-dsa-04-secdir-lc-lonvick-2025-06-04-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-lamps-cms-ml-dsa |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2025-06-05 | |
Requested | 2025-05-22 | |
Authors | Ben S , Adam R , Daniel Van Geest | |
I-D last updated | 2025-07-10 (Latest revision 2025-06-08) | |
Completed reviews |
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -04
by Chris M. Lonvick
(diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -04 by Stewart Bryant (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Chris M. Lonvick |
State | Completed | |
Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-lamps-cms-ml-dsa by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/b7AZHadmr-GeMvZwgM2MKoDb9zs | |
Reviewed revision | 04 (document currently at 05) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2025-06-04 |
review-ietf-lamps-cms-ml-dsa-04-secdir-lc-lonvick-2025-06-04-00
Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The summary of the review is Ready. I found the document to be well written and complete. The Security Considerations section appears appropriate and thorough. I found one very minor nit in the first paragraph of the Security Considerations section: Current: The security considerations [RFC5652] and [I-D.ietf-lamps-dilithium-certificates] apply to this specification as well. Proposed: (Inclusion of "of" before "[RFC5652]", and terminate the sentence after "specification".) The security considerations of [RFC5652] and [I-D.ietf-lamps-dilithium-certificates] apply to this specification. Regards, Chris