Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-15
review-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-15-opsdir-lc-bonica-2017-11-21-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 18)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2017-10-09
Requested 2017-09-25
Other Reviews Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Adam Montville (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -05 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -06 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -08 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -15 by Adam Montville (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -15 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Review State Completed
Reviewer Ron Bonica
Review review-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-15-opsdir-lc-bonica-2017-11-21
Posted at https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ops-dir/current/msg02936.html
Reviewed rev. 15 (document currently at 18)
Review result Ready
Draft last updated 2017-11-21
Review completed: 2017-11-21

Review
review-ietf-lamps-eai-addresses-15-opsdir-lc-bonica-2017-11-21

Folks,

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

Summary: Ready for publication

  This document defines a new name form for inclusion in the otherName
   field of an X.509 Subject Alternative Name and Issuer Alternative
   Name extension that allows a certificate subject to be associated
   with an Internationalized Email Address.

    I confess  to knowing nothing about this topic. But the draft is sufficiently well-written that I understood exactly what the authors were doing and why they were doing it. I would vote YES.


Major issues:

None

Minor issues:

None

Nits:

None