Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lamps-lightweight-cmp-profile-14
review-ietf-lamps-lightweight-cmp-profile-14-genart-lc-halpern-2022-10-14-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-lamps-lightweight-cmp-profile |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 21) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2022-10-24 | |
Requested | 2022-10-10 | |
Authors | Hendrik Brockhaus , David von Oheimb , Steffen Fries | |
I-D last updated | 2022-10-14 | |
Completed reviews |
Dnsdir Last Call review of -14
by David Blacka
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -14 by Joel M. Halpern (diff) Artart Last Call review of -14 by Robert Sparks (diff) Intdir Telechat review of -15 by Sheng Jiang (diff) Iotdir Telechat review of -15 by Niklas Widell (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Joel M. Halpern |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-lamps-lightweight-cmp-profile by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/e5IebZc2HCpuzEdIq8vETvhPJ94 | |
Reviewed revision | 14 (document currently at 21) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2022-10-14 |
review-ietf-lamps-lightweight-cmp-profile-14-genart-lc-halpern-2022-10-14-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-lamps-lightweight-cmp-profile-14 Reviewer: Joel Halpern Review Date: 2022-10-13 IETF LC End Date: 2022-10-24 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: This document is ready for publicationa s a Proposed Standard Major issues: Minor issues: In section 4.1.1 (Enrolling an End Entity to a New PKI), in the description of the ir message, some fields are listed as optional, with text saying roughly required in case A, omitted in case B. Which makes sense. However, the subjectPublicKey is listed as REQUIRED, even though the text only says it is needed for locally generated keys. The text does not deal with whether it should be omitted or Null-DN or? for centrally generated keys? Section 4.1.6 does deal with this, but I am asking because the field is marked in the 4.1.1 ir as being REQUIRED. Nits/editorial comments: