Skip to main content

IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lamps-macaddress-on-05
review-ietf-lamps-macaddress-on-05-genart-lc-gurbani-2026-02-11-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-lamps-macaddress-on
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2026-02-13
Requested 2026-01-30
Authors Russ Housley , Corey Bonnell , Joe Mandel , Tomofumi Okubo , Michael StJohns
I-D last updated 2026-03-12 (Latest revision 2026-03-12)
Completed reviews Genart IETF Last Call review of -05 by Vijay K. Gurbani (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -04 by Sean Turner (diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -05 by Murray Kucherawy (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -06 by David Lou (diff)
Iotdir Telechat review of -06 by Jacqueline McCall (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Vijay K. Gurbani
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-lamps-macaddress-on by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/Vye8diW-FlFVrMfDdyUXcBVWBic
Reviewed revision 05 (document currently at 07)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2026-02-11
review-ietf-lamps-macaddress-on-05-genart-lc-gurbani-2026-02-11-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-lamps-macaddress-on-05
Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
Review Date: 2026-02-11
IETF LC End Date: 2026-02-13
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: The I-D is ready to be published as a Standards Track document.

Major issues: 0

Minor issues: 0

Nits/editorial comments: 1

Nits:

- Section 1 (S1), second paragraph: I suspect that the text here is put to
 discourage implementers from using the IAN extension.  Is there any specific
 reason why normative (SHOULD NOT) language is not used?