Telechat Review of draft-ietf-lamps-macaddress-on-06
review-ietf-lamps-macaddress-on-06-intdir-telechat-lou-2026-03-02-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-lamps-macaddress-on
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Telechat Review
Team Internet Area Directorate (intdir)
Deadline 2026-03-03
Requested 2026-02-20
Requested by Éric Vyncke
Authors Russ Housley , Corey Bonnell , Joe Mandel , Tomofumi Okubo , Michael StJohns
I-D last updated 2026-03-18 (Latest revision 2026-03-12)
Completed reviews Genart IETF Last Call review of -05 by Vijay K. Gurbani (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -04 by Sean Turner (diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -05 by Murray Kucherawy (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -06 by David Lou (diff)
Iotdir Telechat review of -06 by Jacqueline McCall (diff)
Comments 
Once again a short-term notice but having MAC addresses in a X.509 certificate can have a major impact (or be useless in case of randomized MAC address).
Assignment Reviewer David Lou
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-lamps-macaddress-on by Internet Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/RGB_QVQBP2Z2MxjXCG1zUkyxPNw
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 07)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2026-03-02
review-ietf-lamps-macaddress-on-06-intdir-telechat-lou-2026-03-02-00
Document: draft-ietf-lamps-macaddress-on
Title: Media Access Control (MAC) Addresses in X.509 Certificates
Reviewer: David Lou

This draft looks ready to go.  It was well-written and straightforward to
understand.

Major issues:
None

Minor issues:
None

Some nits:
1. P3, "in the Name Constraints extension (NCE) defined in [RFC5280]", I assume "Extension" here?
2. P7, "permitted_subtress" -> "permitted_subtrees"
3. P14, "[IEEERA]" -> "[IEEESA]"