Telechat Review of draft-ietf-lamps-macaddress-on-06
review-ietf-lamps-macaddress-on-06-iotdir-telechat-mccall-2026-02-25-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-lamps-macaddress-on
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Telechat Review
Team Internet of Things Directorate (iotdir)
Deadline 2026-03-03
Requested 2026-02-20
Requested by Éric Vyncke
Authors Russ Housley , Corey Bonnell , Joe Mandel , Tomofumi Okubo , Michael StJohns
I-D last updated 2026-05-20 (Latest revision 2026-03-12)
Completed reviews Genart IETF Last Call review of -05 by Vijay K. Gurbani (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -04 by Sean Turner (diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -05 by Murray Kucherawy (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -06 by David Lou (diff)
Iotdir Telechat review of -06 by Jacqueline McCall (diff)
Comments 
Once again a short-term notice but having MAC addresses in a X.509 certificate can have a major impact (or be useless in case of randomized MAC address).
Assignment Reviewer Jacqueline McCall
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-lamps-macaddress-on by Internet of Things Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iot-directorate/tBBA2hdqJ2BIUVD0aqDt3Bo1PaY
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 07)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2026-02-25
review-ietf-lamps-macaddress-on-06-iotdir-telechat-mccall-2026-02-25-00
I am the assigned iotdir reviewer for this draft. For background on iotdir,
please see the [FAQ] (https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/iotdir). Please resolve
these comments along with any other comments you may receive.

I have reviewed this document and I would say that this is a well thought-out
and structured document. I have marked it as ready with nits based on the
following:

* 3.  MACAddress otherName:  "object identifier (OID)", the 'O' and 'I' should
be capitalised.

* 3.4.2.  OtherName.MACAddress Path Validation Processing: "permitted_subtress"
should be "permitted_subtrees" (typo)